Showing posts with label Reviews. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Reviews. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 9, 2013

NewsAdvance.com: Hugh Dancy shines in NBC's 'Hannibal' by Casey Gillis



After giving up on “The Following,” and never being all that into “Bates Motel” to begin with, I was genuinely surprised how much I liked NBC’s “Hannibal.”

The drama, which premiered last week and returns with a new episode at 10 p.m. Thursday, does, in fact, feature Hannibal Lecter (played with restrained glee by Danish actor Mads Mikkelsen).

But, for now at least, it’s more about FBI profiler Will Graham (Hugh Dancy, husband of recent awards show darling Claire Danes).

I’m always complaining about the predictable nature of cop shows — how one seems to crib from the other, and how most police detective characters are cut from the same cloth. They’re either quirky to a fault (think Sherlock on CBS’s “Elementary”) or don’t play well with others (insert the name of any “Law & Order” cop here).

Will has some of that shading — he has an innate ability to get inside the minds of depraved killers and can somehow deduce their motives out of thin air  — but the show itself is so different, and Dancy’s performance so good, that you won’t hear any complaints from me.

In the first episode, Will was brought on to consult on a case; college coeds were being abducted from campuses in Minnesota, and Jack Crawford (Laurence Fishburne), head of the FBI’s Behavioral Science Unit, wanted Will’s input because he has “a very specific way of thinking about things.”

“What he has is pure empathy,” Hannibal said about Will later on. “He can assume your point of view or mine and maybe some other points of view that scare him. It’s an uncomfortable gift.”

During the first interaction between Will and Crawford, we learned that Will finds it difficult to be social and, on the autism spectrum, he falls “closer to Asperger’s and autistics than narcissists and sociopaths,” he explained.

Will getting into the heads of killers is most often illustrated by scenes of him actually committing the various crimes he’s investigating. There are also lots of other stylistic touches from creator Bryan Fuller, whose credits include “Pushing Daisies,” “Wonderfalls” and “Dead Like Me” (also “Mockingbird Lane,” NBC’s misguided remake of “The Munsters,” but let’s not talk about that).

Fittingly enough, that first case, with the missing girls, involved a cannibalistic murderer but not, natch, Hannibal himself.  He wound up in Will’s orbit after Crawford approached the psychiatrist about profiling someone, but we still don’t know if it’s Will or the killer they were pursuing.

At this point, nobody knows what Hannibal is doing with his spare time, though there are lots of sly nods toward what we already know about the character — including an extended scene of him preparing liver for dinner (no fava beans in sight).

He showed more of his true colors by the end of pilot when, as he and Will closed in on the killer, Hannibal called the guy to warn him.

Moving forward, the show will focus on the unlikely partnership between Will and Hannibal. But this is ultimately a showcase for Dancy, who allows us to empathize with Will as much as he’s able to empathize with others. Danes may want to clear off some space on the awards shelf for her hubby.

Sunday, April 7, 2013

AintItCool.com: Herc Loves Bryan Fuller’s Badass New Lecter Series HANNIBAL And Calls It The Single Goriest Thing Ever Broadcast On Network Television!!




Am I to understand Caroline Dhavernas (“Wonderfalls”) plays Alan Bloom?
She plays forensic psychiatrist and FBI consultant Alana Bloom, thanks to one of the Starbuck-ish gender switches this series employs. Episode two introduces tattlecrime.com blogger Fredericka “Freddie” Lounds. Male Freddie Loundses were played by Stephen Lang and Phillip Seymour Hoffman in the movies. They also worked for print outlets.

The big news?
The title character doesn’t show until midway through the first episode. The series’ central character, as in the book “Red Dragon,” is Graham, played rather differently in the movies by William Petersen and Edward Norton.

How does Dancy play Graham differently?
This Graham is far more socially awkward, which I understand is truer to the Graham in the novel. He may even have Aspergers or a another strain of autism.

What else is NBC not telling us?
Mikkelsen (“Casino Royale”) does not look like the movie Lecters played by Brian Cox and Anthony Hopkins, not, nor does he sound like them. The Danish actor brandishes a much thicker European accent. Again, this is consistent with the books, which explain that Lecter was raised in Lithuania and France and didn’t come to America to begin his residency in Baltimore until he was in his twenties.

[Fun Fact: Mandy Patinkin (“Ragtime,” “Yentl”), Brian Dennehy (“First Blood,” “Silverado”), John Lithgow (“Footloose,” “2010”), and William Petersen’s “To Live And Die In L.A.” director William Friedkin were all considered to play Hannibal Lecktor in “Manhunter.”]

How does it start?
With Graham recalling a particularly horrific crime scene. The opening introduces us to the lightsaber/windshield-wiper effect that helps show us how Graham enters the minds of highly skilled murderers.

What’s great?
There’s a level of detail and artistry here that, frankly, most viewers will miss the first time out – and most TV series would never bother with.

Somebody at the network realized “The Walking Dead” is the most popular series on television and permitted Fuller to embrace Thomas Harris’ horror and make the goriest series ever broadcast on NBC.

The brisk pace, which keeps the pilot fast-fowarding to “the good parts.” The surprisingly naked young corpses. The torment that Dancy brings to Graham. Fishburne’s much more complex version of FBI profiling chief Jack Crawford. Hettienne Park’s perversely flirty hair and fiber expert Beverly Katz generally, and the way she smiles when she asks Graham if he’s unstable.

Graham’s roommates. The Quantico men’s room. The Evil Minds Research Museum. The towels. Lecter’s office. Lecter’s regard for Dan Folger’s tissue. “Kids in the Hall” icon Scott Thompson, surprisingly effective in a mostly dramatic role. “And this is when it gets truly horrifying for Mrs. Marlowe.” “That’s not exactly true, is it?” “She looks like the other girls.” “How’s the cat?” “I do when I’m in your company, doctor.” “So do forts.” “Who’s profile is he working on?” “I’m pretty sure she was alive.” “You will.” “The finest china used only for special guests.”

So much about the pilot’s final five minutes.

Saturday, April 6, 2013

TV3: "Hannibal", un plat molt exquisit escrit per Toni de la Torre



Ja he vist el primer episodi de la sèrie de l'assassí caníbal. Aquí en tens la crítica!

El que menys m'esperava d'una sèrie sobre Hannibal Lecter és que seria un plat servit amb bon gust. Elegant, suau, subtil, deliciós. Tots aquests són adjectius que es poden aplicar a aquesta sèrie. Adjectius que es poden assaborir i que es queden enganxats al teu paladar. Però sobretot adjectius que contrasten amb la resta de sèries de televisió sobre assassins en sèrie. Normalment la idea del psicòpata assassí és explotada per impactar l'espectador i les ficcions on apareixen són molt gràfiques, contenen alts nivells de violència i elements associables al gènere del terror. Un exemple recent seria "The Following".

En canvi "Hannibal" ofereix delicadesa. Una elecció que té dues funcions molt clares. Per una banda, l'elegància visual de la sèrie és un reflex del caràcter del personatge. Ens presenten un Hannibal Lecter fred però amant de les formes, que sempre va vestit amb trajo i que prepara la taula amb tot luxe de detalls exquisits. L'home és tot modals, especialment quan és hora de menjar. Per l'altra banda, també serveix per definir la sèrie i deixa clar des del principi que no li interessa sumar-se a la llarga cua de ficcions amb un assassí terrible que comet crims escabrosos i cruels que han de formar part dels malsons de l'espectador.

De fet, si alguna cosa fa "Hannibal" és plantejar fins a quin punt aquesta imagineria que creen les ficcions sobre assassins en sèrie ens afecta com a espectadors, a la nostra visió de la societat. Més que en la crueltat dels assassinats o els ensurts, està més interessada en els efectes que té la violència. Per això el protagonista no és Hannibal Lecter, si no Will Graham, que s'emporta molts més minuts de metratge (com a mínim al primer episodi). Ell és un expert en l'anàlisi de la ment dels criminals que pateix perquè l'exercici d'empatia que ha de fer per comprendre'ls l'afecta en excés. Ha de pensar com ells, acaba sent com ells.

És molt interessant que la sèrie plantegi aquesta reflexió perquè, sent en Will Graham el protagonista i per tant el punt de vista de l'espectador, estableix un paral·lelisme entre els efectes que la violència té en ell i els que té en l'espectador. Quan nosaltres mirem una sèrie sobre un assassí en sèrie, també ens estem ficant dins del cap de l'assassí en sèrie. Com ens afecta això? Per què ens agrada fer-ho? Si el que veiem en aquestes sèries passa a formar part de la nostra idea de la realitat, això vol dir que la figura de l'assassí és present a la nostra societat? Pot esdevenir icònica? I en tot cas, què és el que representa?

Evidentment, no totes les sèries sobre assassins són iguals. No és el mateix veure "Dexter" (que com a gènere estaria més a prop de la idea del vigilant del còmic, ja que els seus crims estan justificats a nivell moral) que veure qualsevol dels episodis de "Criminal Minds". En tot cas, m'agrada que "Hannibal" vulgui formular preguntes en comptes de simplement afegir-se a aquesta moda pels assassins que hi ha darrerament en la ficció. Les converses que en Will manté amb l'Hannibal sobre aquestes qüestions són molt interessants. Al capdavall, tots dos són psicoanalistes, i no dubten a desmuntar-se l'un a l'altre a cop de diàleg.

La sèrie mostra molt bé els efectes que la violència causa en Will. Des de la primera seqüència veiem, d'una manera molt efectiva, com es posa en el lloc de l'assassí de torn. El recurs dels canvis de llum que passen per davant de la càmera serveixen per ensenyar-nos com la seva capacitat d'empatia el porta a perdre's dins de la ment del criminal. Ajuda la interpretació de Hugh Dancy, que realment clava el paper. La seva feina m'ha agradat gairebé tant com la de Mads Mikkelsen com a Hannibal, però la d'aquest últim encara té més mèrit, ja que ofereix una cara nova del personatge i aconsegueix que no pensem en Anthony Hopkins.

Justament són els problemes de Will per enfrontar-se als casos sense involucrar-s'hi massa el que fa que conegui Hannibal. El cap de l'FBI, Jack Crawford, vol comptar amb l'habilitat de Will, però per fer-ho s'ha d'assegurar que està bé, cosa que el porta a contractar el doctor Lecter perquè li faci un seguiment psiquiàtric. La premissa inicial és massa elaborada, però serveix per posar en marxa la dinàmica entre Will i Hannibal, que a partir d'ara resoldran diversos crims (el primer sense saber que el segon és un assassí caníbal, fet que només coneix l'espectador i que és la clau de la tensió que es respira a la sèrie).

En Will acabarà descobrint l'Hannibal? L'Hannibal tindrà temptacions de queixalar en Will? Aquests dos dubtes són el motor d'una sèrie que de vegades pot pecar de poc plausible: Will resol els casos sense que ens expliquin com dedueix tot el que diu, i de vegades Hannibal es comporta amb una fredor excessiva que és més que sospitosa, però ningú sembla adonar-se'n. Però ho compensa amb les fosques imatges amb les que ens obsequia. Imatges esfereïdores però al mateix temps artístiques, inquietants i alhora fascinants, que descriuen molt bé l'efecte que provoca el fet de saber que una persona pugui matar un altre.

És en aquestes imatges hipnòtiques on es mostra la mà de Bryan Fuller, showrunner de la sèrie. Encara que amb un to molt diferent, en les seves anteriors sèries (com "Pushing Daisies" o "Dead Like Me") ja havia mostrat una gran capacitat per mostrar escenes suggerents. El resultat és una sèrie molt sòlida i amb molta personalitat, de les que costa deixar de mirar. Aporta una visió diferent al seu gènere, sembla que aguantarà bé l'estructura procedimenal i està molt per sobre de la recent"Bates Motel". Si hi ha un assassí que pugui prendre el relleu de Dexter a partir de l'any vinent, aquest és Hannibal Lecter.

EntertainmentHollywood: NBC's Hannibal: Not just another serial killer show By Adam Bryant,



In a year that's already given us Fox's The Following and A&E's Bates Motel, some might argue that we don't need another serial killer TV show. And they'd probably be right.

But NBC's Hannibal isn't just another serial killer show.

Spring Preview: Gets scoop on all the must-see new shows

Taking characters from the Thomas Harris novels that inspired a film series that includes Manhunter, The Silence of the Lambs and Red Dragon, executive producer Bryan Fuller (Wonderfalls, Pushing Daisies) has created a sophisticated drama that doesn't glorify the violence of mass murder but rather examines the toll that hunting serial killers takes on the minds and souls of those who hunt. In fact, even though the show is named after Dr. Hannibal Lecter, who was immortalized as one of the greatest pop culture villains of all time thanks to Anthony Hopkins' Oscar-winning portrayal, the series — at least initially — isn't entirely focused on the cannibal in the three-piece suit.

Instead, the spotlight is on our hero Will Graham (Hugh Dancy), a profiler who assists the FBI in tracking down serial killers because of his unique ability to think and feel like the murderers he's chasing. Although the character is known in Harris' Red Dragon as the damaged man who caught Lecter, the NBC series begins several years before the events of the book. Will and his boss Jack Crawford (Laurence Fishburne) first meet Hannibal (Mads Mikkelsen), a Baltimore psychiatrist, when they bring him in to offer his insights on a killer who's mounting his young, female victims on animal antlers.

"The Will Graham character in the books hasn't really been accurately represented in the films because there's not enough real estate to accurately represent how complex he is," Fuller tells TVGuide.com. "There are little hints at his greater neuroses and personality disorders. So, I thought, 'There's an angle into this story that hasn't been taken yet.' There's something so unique in how crazy Hannibal is and something so unique in how crazy Will Graham is, that both of these men who are uniquely insane need each other to understand themselves."

It was that element of the script that hooked both Mikkelsen and Dancy. "I was quite reluctant from the beginning based on the fact that somebody has done [this character] before to perfection," he says. "Why should we go back and do something that somebody else has already done that good? ... But in the script there is kind of a bromance between Will and Hannibal that is quite new. I believe that Hannibal is quite happy to finally be able to make a friend."

Adds Dancy: "Hannibal is really the only other person on the planet who is as smart about the things that Will does. So it's like the two greatest chess players of their generation sitting down together, and I think there's a genuine thrill in that for Will. They speak the same language. And even though Will would resist this idea, they do have a certain amount in common. The things that make [Will] tick are potentially quite dark."

Indeed, the gorgeously shot pilot — directed by David Slade, who helmed the equally striking Awake pilot last season — features a visual flourish that takes viewers inside Will's mind. As he reconstructs crimes, he pictures himself, not the killers, committing the gruesome acts. Naturally, carrying those images around in your head becomes taxing.  "What you see to some degree is deterioration in Will," Dancy says. "I think that Will sees and rationally understands the importance and the value of stopping these people and catching them, but he doesn't get the sense of relief that maybe most other people would. I found it interesting that he's somebody who's really striving to do good, driven partially by the fear that he might be able to do bad."

So, as Hannibal consults on Will's cases — and does some secret killing of his own on the side — he begins to encourage Will to open up to him. "It is a seduction and Will is seduced," Fuller says. "I think [Hannibal's] educating himself on how not to get caught. But also he genuinely likes Will Graham and Jack Crawford. He doesn't consider them rude men or betrayers of art and beauty like his victims. His victims are free-range rude, and if you're a pig of a human being, you're going to be his bacon. For him, looking at Will Graham, who has the ability to understand without judgment how horrible people do the horrible things they do, he feels that for perhaps the first time in his life there is the opportunity to make a friend who can clearly understand what he does and who he is."

But don't worry, the show won't always be so lovey-dovey.  Although Mikkelsen's Lecter is blissfully understated, the Danish actor — best known stateside as the Bond villain Le Chiffre in Casino Royale — promises we'll see shades of the Lecter we know. "We can't detach totally from the films or the books because the character is what he is," he says. "Hannibal does not see himself as a psychopath, of course, and I don't either. He's much more than that. The closest I can come to a definition is that he's the fallen angel; he's Satan."

But Mikkelsen and Fuller agree that Hannibal also humanizes Lecter in a way viewers might not expect. "I was fascinated by the social Hannibal," Fuller says. "What are the types of relationships Hannibal Lecter would have as a free man in society? ... [I wanted] to see Hannibal as not necessarily always the antagonist and for him to have a genuine appreciation of the relationships in his life. ... There are some deeply, deeply moving scenes toward the end of the season where Hannibal allows himself to feel. He goes to such genuine emotional places and raw vulnerability. We're clearly not doing Anthony Hopkins or Brian Cox. I love those performances, but I didn't want to go near them."

Although the show doesn't necessarily go for quick-jolt scares, its murder tableaux can be gruesome. And while, unlike The Following, the show and its characters actively meditate on the cost of constantly witnessing such horror and violence, there's bound to be viewers who don't want this particular brand of drama on network TV. And Fuller says that's OK.

"As somebody who's been reading Fangoria magazine since I was 10 years old, I am a fan of horror," Fuller says. "I love The Walking Dead and the drama and the high stakes of that world and the romance that happens. But I also love it when a zombie's head explodes. ... Hannibal is a horror story, so I felt like we have a responsibility to honor the genre.

"You can't buy a Victorian house and knock out all the walls and put in floor-to-ceiling windows and disrespect what it is by making it something else," Fuller continues. "We're also going to deliver a sophisticated human drama, but make no mistake, Hannibal Lecter is a horror character. We're going to push the envelope until the envelope pushes back. ... It's not about anything political. It's about what kind of house you are living in — and we happen to be living in a horror house."

Wednesday, April 3, 2013

Newsobserver.com: 'Hannibal' on NBC is the best -- and most chilling -- new show of the season

Some highlights here, but full review here:
:
In addition to the inventive storylines and excellent acting (Mikkelsen in particular is mesmerizing), "Hannibal" distinguishes itself from anything else on network television by being beautifully and imaginatively filmed. (It's developed, executive produced and written by Bryan Fuller, the creator the exquisite "Pushing Daisies" and "Wonderfalls.") The violence and crime scenes are graphic, but not gratuitously so, in my opinion.
:
:
"Hannibal" looks and feels like a show you would see on cable, which is about the highest compliment you can pay a network program these days. And it's by far the best show NBC has introduced in years, as well as the best new broadcast network show of the season.

Read more here: http://blogs.newsobserver.com/tv/review-hannibal-on-nbc-is-best-and-most-chilling-new-show-of-the-season#storylink=cpy

Read more here: http://blogs.newsobserver.com/tv/review-hannibal-on-nbc-is-best-and-most-chilling-new-show-of-the-season#storylink=c

New York Post: 'Hannibal' has great taste in people by Linda Stasi



Some highlights below:
:
:
The series is the most beautifully shot and produced show on network TV, with many scenes simply and literally breathtaking — especially, believe it or not, when they find a field planted with humans to act as mushroom compost.
:
:
...the thing that does give this show its grounding is the acting. Dancy is a perfect, tortured soul; Fishburne is everyman with a brain; and Mads Mikkelsen is perfectly named.

HitFix.com: NBC's 'Hannibal' a riveting 'Silence of the Lambs' prequel by Alan Sepinwall

http://www.hitfix.com/whats-alan-watching/review-nbcs-hannibal-a-riveting-silence-of-the-lambs-prequel


Some highlights below, but complete review here:
:
:
So what makes "Hannibal" so special? Start with Bryan Fuller, adapting material from the first Lecter book, "Red Dragon," into a series about how FBI profiler Will Graham (Hugh Dancy) and his boss Jack Crawford (Laurence Fishburne) realized that respected psychiatrist and Bureau ally Hannibal Lecter (Mads Mikkelsen) is in fact a cannibalistic sociopath.
:
:
Fuller teams up with pilot director David Slade (who also helmed the gorgeous first episode of "Awake," which debuted in this timeslot about a year ago) to come up with an elegantly simple way to demonstrate both the general toll of this work on the FBI agents and what makes Will Graham special in particular.
:
:
And Dancy is sensational as this version of Graham.
:
:
"Hannibal" is the last of this season's serial killer shows. It's also, by a very wide margin, the best.

Tuesday, April 2, 2013

DreadCentral: Hannibal Series Preview: Who's the Smartest Man in the Room? by Drew Tinnin

http://www.dreadcentral.com/news/65249/hannibal-series-preview-whos-smartest-man-room


A few highlights below, and full review here:
:
:
In a nutshell, “Hannibal” is a raw, intellectual procedural following Will and Hannibal as they track a different serial killer each week. Through the course of their investigations, you slowly find out more about Hannibal through Will's findings and theories about the killer they seek. Then Hannibal, as Will’s oddly engaging therapist, discusses the emotional effects of the case while dealing with the usually violent conclusion at the end of each episode.
:
:
Hannibal just sees the world in a different way than us. So do these other serial killers but not as clearly as he does. There is no line for him, which is why he sees beauty in killing. He is pure in this way, and Hannibal must stay mysterious for the show to work long-term. 
:
:
Obviously, having these interesting characters on television means you can think about their motivations and discuss them even more than before, if you so desire. Usually shows like “House” or “Sherlock” are compelling mostly because the lead character is always the smartest man in the room. “Hannibal” gives you two such characters, and the compelling thing is guessing which one of them is smarter.

BuffaloNews: ‘Hannibal’ nightmare assumes diabolical new dimension as TV series by Jeff Simon



Some highlights here, the whole article is here:
:
:
“Hannibal” is as original a take on the modern mythology of Hannibal Lecter as “Elementary” is on the much older mythology of Sherlock Holmes.
:
:
The developer of this exceptional series is Bryan Fuller, the brilliant fellow who once gave us the all-too-shortlived “Wonderfalls.” Unlike, say, “Criminal Minds,” here is a TV series in which everyone’s favorite philosopher/shrink/cannibal/psychopath observes blandly “Killing must feel good to God, too. He does it all the time. Are we not created in his image?”
:
:
“Hannibal” is a deeply sinister TV show. And courtesy of Fuller, quite a brilliant one that gives us weekly Harris’ pivotal creations in a way that Harris himself might not have imagined.

Monday, April 1, 2013

Nerdly.co.uk: ‘Hannibal’ – Series Premiere (P)review by Nathan Smith



One thing is very clear from the first few minutes of Bryan Fuller’s new series, Hannibal, it’s his own take on the characters invented in the world of literature by Thomas Harris and then essayed on screen in film as The Silence of the Lambs, Hannibal, Hannibal Rising and Manhunter/Red Dragon. He’s not cribbing from source materials to create a pastiche of overly clichéd characters to make a by-the books procedural. No, this is his world and he’s simultaneously managed to create a world that feels like Harris’ and those aforementioned films and yet still makes this his own. It doesn’t feel like his previous works, even the sadly truncated Mockingbird Lane felt like a new Fuller take on an old classic.
:
:
Throughout the pilot, David Slade’s direction is haunting and gothic, and creates exactly the mood required for the series. It’s Dario Argento by way of television procedural. There are scene reminiscent of Kubrick’s The Shining. It’s cracking direction all through and through. The direction during Will’s analysis of the murders or even the dreams he has during the investigation during the pilot feels like an actual dream and creates some definitive chills. It’s not as violent as the other serial killer drama on the air nor as mean spirited and brutal either. The violence services the story instead of vice versa.
:
:
The interplay between Dancy and Mikkelsen is chatty, playful and yet handled as two men playing a dangerous game of chess. Thankfully, both pilot director Slade and Fuller allow Mads Mikkelsen to flesh out the character as his own, rather than how Hopkins played it. Here, Lector is a man using caution to hide himself and doesn’t allow for himself to show through whatever façade he has. It’s such beautiful restraint.

:
:
The performance of Hugh Dancy as Will Graham is a damn fine breakout.

:
:
Hannibal is one of the strongest pilots this year, and has the ability to be the breakout hit that Bryan Fuller damn well deserves. It’s so very compelling and offers a new slant on a story everyone knows, and yet breathes some new life into it, and a genre of television as old as time.

Saturday, March 30, 2013

IGN: Hannibal: "Apéritif" Review by Eric Goldman



"Hannibal is terrific. It’s not really a surprise, given the considerable talents of Hannibal's executive producer and showrunner, Bryan Fuller, whose highly creative mind has given us wonderfully eccentric shows like Pushing Daisies and Wonderfalls, and who solidified just how strong he could be working with more serious-minded genre stories via his episodes of Heroes in Season 1, especially the standout “Company Man.”"

"The casting is key in Hannibal, starting with Mads Mikkelsen in the title role. The Danish actor, best known for Casino Royale, captures the combination of brilliance, arrogance and creepiness we equate with Hannibal, while not feeling like he’s copying Hopkins."

"Also excellent is Hugh Dancy as Graham, who, despite the title, is the true lead character. Hannibal takes Harris’ ideas about Graham and expands them in really well thought out ways."

"The pilot was directed by David Slade, who also does a tremendous job of creating the world this series will exist in and making it feel distinct and evocative. There is a certain visual manner in which we see the way Will sees a crime scene – how he, mentally, takes himself back in time through the crime. This visual is very cool, involving stylistic wipes across the screen that sweep away what is currently happening and reveal what happened before."

Friday, March 29, 2013

Variety: NBC delivers a bloody good meal TV by Brian Lowry


"...it’s clear that showrunner Bryan Fuller has brought a semi-hypnotic quality to this prequel adaptation of Thomas Harris’ Hannibal Lecter character..."

"...visually arresting, and thanks in large part to the central trio of Mads Mikkelsen, Hugh Dancy and Laurence Fishburne, quite interesting. Bon appetit."


Thursday, March 28, 2013

EW: Hannibal Review by Jeff Jensen



"the horror-pop icon has been reinvented in a cable-style drama so finely acted, visually scrumptious, and deliciously subversive. Set during the cannibal shrink's pre-incarceration days, Hannibal distinguishes itself from The Following, Bates Motel, and American Horror Story by its distinctive storytelling voice, Bryan Fuller. The creator of Wonderfalls and Pushing Daisies again tells the tale of an alienated individual with an extraordinary talent that feels like an affliction.".

Wednesday, March 27, 2013

Denver Post: “Hannibal” a savory new entree on NBC By Joanne Ostrow



Depending on your appetite for gore, you may want to tuck into “Hannibal,” a prequel to the Hannibal Lecter/”Silence of the Lambs” tale, coming to NBC Thursday, April 4 (at 9 p.m. on Channel 9). A well constructed, masterfully written piece, “Hannibal” exceeds the “ick” factor of any crime procedural on the air. What else could we have expected?
 
With mushrooms growing out of the bodies of buried but still living victims, a pair of lungs prepared gourmet-style by the famously cannibalistic doctor, and with enough spurting blood to rival a premium cable series, “Hannibal” is off to a strong start as one of the grisliest dramas on broadcast TV.
The characters are so compelling, however, that you may give in to the gore-fest. Hugh Dancy as Special Agent Will Graham, Laurence Fishburne as Agent Jack Crawford and Mads Mikkelsen as Dr. Hannibal Lecter are a strong triangle at the heart of the story. Each inhabits his character with authority, making the twisted minds seem credibly skewed. The soundtrack is wonderfully eerie, suggesting the damaged inner lives.
 
Bryan Fuller (“Pushing Daisies”) has created an effective backstory for one of the great villains of modern crime fiction. The premise: Before “Silence of the Lambs,” before “Red Dragon,” Hannibal Lecter (Mikkelsen of “Casino Royale”) was a brilliant psychiatrist in the employ of the FBI. He was recruited by FBI boss Jack Crawford (Fishburne, “Man Of Steel”), the head of the FBI’s Behavioral Science Unit, to crack the tough cases. Now Lecter must help a sensitive but gifted criminal profiler, Will Graham (Hugh Dancy, “The Big C”), who is haunted by his ability to see into the minds of serial killers. Will, the hunter of psychopaths, finds himself seated opposite Hannibal, the biggest psychopath with the biggest secret, discussing dark feelings and precarious mental states.

 Fuller’s series is based on characters from the book “Red Dragon” by Thomas Harris. While this level of violent imagery is not my cup of tea, I was drawn in by the characterizations. Consider that a warning, and bon apetit.

Tuesday, March 26, 2013

ShockTillYouDrop Review of the first five episodes of Hannibal by Paul Doro


"While Fishburne and Mikkelsen are very good, Dancy is the star, both literally and in terms of performance quality. He does an outstanding job of subtlety conveying how painful human interaction is for him, and despite being abrasive and unpleasant, you are always in his corner and really feel for the guy. His gift, which is so useful and important, causes him enormous anguish. He also has a wicked sense of humor, generating a few much-needed laughs amid all the darkness."


AWESOME, this is great news, having seen Hugh Dancy in several roles in the past, I know he is a magnificent actor. For Season 4 ("Red Dragon") a very subtle performance is required. I've read the book "Red Dragon" many, many times over the past twenty years, and for me the emotional heart of the book is the small scene where Will Graham is explaining to his stepson, Willy, why he had to spend time in hospital after shooting Garrett Hobbs. I know Hugh Dancy has the skill and craft to give the performance required for that scene and for the character of Will.